Child Protection
Overview
DCI-Palestine seeks to instill
changes in governmental, institutional and community policies and practices
towards children at the Palestinian Authority (P.A.) level. To this end, DCI
implements the following activities:
Legal representation - One of the key objectives of DCI is to ensure that
the P.A.’s justice system conforms to all relevant international juvenile
justice standards. The organisation provides legal representation to children
in conflict with the law before Palestinian courts, and monitors juvenile
detention centres, police stations and prisons where children are held in
custody.
Influencing child-related
legislation - DCI participates in
technical committees responsible for drafting laws related to child rights,
such as the draft Juvenile Justice Law.
Capacity-building - DCI provides training to the Palestinian police,
lawyers, judges and community based organisations working with children, in
accordance with international juvenile justice standards.
Networking - DCI is a member of the Child Protection Network
(CPN), comprised of organisations working with child victims of violence, abuse
and/or neglect across the West Bank. DCI is also a founding member of the
Palestinian Network for Children’s Rights (PNCR), which implements advocacy
initiatives to promote child rights in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.
Background
Following the Oslo Accords
in 1993, agreements were signed between Israel and the Palestinian Liberation
Organisation (PLO) establishing the P.A.. These agreements transferred a number
of powers and responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to the P.A.,
whilst Israel remained ultimately responsible as the occupying power under the
Fourth Geneva Convention. The agreements divided the West Bank into three
zones, referred to as Areas A, B and C. Currently, the P.A. bears full civil
and security responsibility in Area A, but shares security responsibilities
with Israel in Areas B. In Area C, Israel retains full civil and security
authority, including law enforcement.
Legal framework
Laws continue to remain in
force in the West Bank and Gaza Strip dating back to the Ottoman Period, the
British Mandate and the period when the territories were under the respective
administrations of Jordan and Egypt. Overlaid on this legislative mix are over 1,700
Israeli military orders issued since June 1967 which are enforced in Israeli
military courts in the West Bank, as well as laws passed by the P.A. since the
first Palestinian Legislative Council elections in 1996. Some of these laws
apply to both the West Bank and Gaza Strip, whilst others only apply in one of
these areas or the other, depending on subsequent legislation and historical
circumstances.
Areas of concern
As part of its monitoring programme,
DCI collects sworn testimonies from children in conflict with the law to help
identify areas of concern within the system. In addition to collecting
testimonies, DCI regularly meets with relevant duty bearers and experts in the
field of juvenile justice in order to identify weaknesses in the system, and to
develop practical solutions. Some key areas of concern identified by DCI
include the following:
Juvenile courts: Under the P.A. juvenile justice system, there is an
absence of specialised juvenile courts, staffed by appropriately trained
professionals.
Statistics: There is an absence of unified statistics relating
to children in conflict with the law which hinders the ability to obtain a
comprehensive and clear picture of the operation of the juvenile justice
system. This in turn makes it difficult to ascertain the scale of some
problems.
Legislative reform: The P.A. juvenile justice system is still
significantly influenced by legislation dating back to the British Mandate and
Jordanian administrations. Efforts have been made to consolidate and modernise
the law in line with international norms and standards, but further work is
still required.
Ill-treatment: There is evidence that in some cases children
encounter some form of ill-treatment following their arrest. Testimonial
evidence suggests that law enforcement officials use a combination of physical
violence, threats and verbal abuse during questioning, transfer and detention,
leading many children to provide confessions. In some cases, this treatment may
amount to torture.
No comments:
Post a Comment